Concluding remarks. History, sociology, theory and the fallacy of misplaced abstractness

Abstract: Partly through autobiographical reflection on his own intellectual development as a historical sociologist and sociological theorist, the author stresses both the need for theory in the writing of history and the necessity of avoiding the wrong – unhelpful – kind of theory. As a one-time student of Talcott Parsons, he recognised the danger posed by »the fallacy of misplaced abstractness«, and the trap presented by the prestige of over-abstract concepts. Many sociological theorists since Parsons – including Niklas Luhmann – have fallen into this trap, as have, under their influence, other empirical sociological and historical researchers. Instead, the author commends as more fruitful the kind of processual thinking derived from another major figure in the history of the University of Bielefeld, Norbert Elias. The paper concludes with some illustrations from the history of the USA. http://www.inter-disciplines.org/index.php/indi/article/view/928

Object Details

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Concluding remarks. History, sociology, theory and the fallacy of misplaced abstractness ; volume:1 ; number:1 ; day:11 ; month:10 ; year:2010 ; InterDisciplines ; 1, Heft 1 (11.10.2010)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Mennell, Stephen

Further information

• DOI: 10.4119/indi-928
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2018121115114367737093
• Rights: Open Access unbekannt; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:53 AM CEST