Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists' views on peer review and lottery
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
In: Philipps, A.: Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists' views on peer review and lottery. In: Science and Public Policy 49 (2022), Nr. 3, S. 365-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab084
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Hannover
- (who)
-
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
- (when)
-
2021
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Hannover
- (who)
-
Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
- (when)
-
2021
- Creator
-
Philipps, Axel
- DOI
-
10.15488/15812
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024011801132425985565
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
- 15.08.2025, 7:37 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Philipps, Axel
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover
- Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)
Time of origin
- 2021
Other Objects (12)
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery
Vaccination Lottery
The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants
Do lottery operators exploit their lottery power? Efficiency and equality considerations in optimal lottery design
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England.
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England
The matrimonial Lottery
Efficient lottery design
Efficient lottery design
Research and funding : A German-American guide for historians and social scientists
Research - study - funding : a German-American guide for historians and social scientists
Scientists’ views about lay perceptions of volcanic hazard and risk
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery
Vaccination Lottery
The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants
Do lottery operators exploit their lottery power? Efficiency and equality considerations in optimal lottery design
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England.
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England
The matrimonial Lottery
Efficient lottery design
Efficient lottery design
Research and funding : A German-American guide for historians and social scientists
Research - study - funding : a German-American guide for historians and social scientists
Scientists’ views about lay perceptions of volcanic hazard and risk
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery
Vaccination Lottery
The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants
Do lottery operators exploit their lottery power? Efficiency and equality considerations in optimal lottery design
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England.
A lottery within a lottery? An Examination of the Distribution of Lottery Funds in England
The matrimonial Lottery
Efficient lottery design
Efficient lottery design
Research and funding : A German-American guide for historians and social scientists
Research - study - funding : a German-American guide for historians and social scientists