Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1742-4755
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:30 ; month:5 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2015
Reproductive health ; 12, Heft 1 (30.5.2015), 1-7, 12.2015
- Urheber
-
Merviel, Philippe
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Cabry-Goubet, Rosalie
Lourdel, Emmanuelle
Devaux, Aviva
Belhadri-Mansouri, Naima
Copin, Henri
Benkhalifa, Moncef
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12978-015-0039-2
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016110413022
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:45 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Merviel, Philippe
- Cabry-Goubet, Rosalie
- Lourdel, Emmanuelle
- Devaux, Aviva
- Belhadri-Mansouri, Naima
- Copin, Henri
- Benkhalifa, Moncef
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders
Brain perfusion in fibromyalgia patients and its differences between responders and poor responders to gabapentin
Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
Corifollitropin alfa for poor responders patients, a prospective randomized study
Third COVID-19 vaccine dose boosts neutralizing antibodies in poor responders
Natural Cycle Results in Lower Implantation Failure than Ovarian Stimulation in Advanced-Age Poor Responders Undergoing IVF: Fertility Outcomes from 585 Patients
Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
Cai’s prescription inhibits granulosa cell apoptosis through ARHGAP4 on poor ovarian responders
Treatment Switch in Poor Responders with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
Controlled ovulation of the dominant follicle using progestin in minimal stimulation in poor responders
Galcanezumab effects on incidence of headache after occurrence of triggers, premonitory symptoms, and aura in responders, non-responders, super-responders, and super non-responders
Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders
Brain perfusion in fibromyalgia patients and its differences between responders and poor responders to gabapentin
Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
Corifollitropin alfa for poor responders patients, a prospective randomized study
Third COVID-19 vaccine dose boosts neutralizing antibodies in poor responders
Natural Cycle Results in Lower Implantation Failure than Ovarian Stimulation in Advanced-Age Poor Responders Undergoing IVF: Fertility Outcomes from 585 Patients
Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
Cai’s prescription inhibits granulosa cell apoptosis through ARHGAP4 on poor ovarian responders
Treatment Switch in Poor Responders with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
Controlled ovulation of the dominant follicle using progestin in minimal stimulation in poor responders
Galcanezumab effects on incidence of headache after occurrence of triggers, premonitory symptoms, and aura in responders, non-responders, super-responders, and super non-responders
Predicting IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders
Brain perfusion in fibromyalgia patients and its differences between responders and poor responders to gabapentin
Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
Corifollitropin alfa for poor responders patients, a prospective randomized study
Third COVID-19 vaccine dose boosts neutralizing antibodies in poor responders
Natural Cycle Results in Lower Implantation Failure than Ovarian Stimulation in Advanced-Age Poor Responders Undergoing IVF: Fertility Outcomes from 585 Patients
Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
Cai’s prescription inhibits granulosa cell apoptosis through ARHGAP4 on poor ovarian responders
Treatment Switch in Poor Responders with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
Controlled ovulation of the dominant follicle using progestin in minimal stimulation in poor responders