Arbeitspapier

Governing collective action in the face of observational error

We present results from a repeated public goods experiment where subjects choose by vote one of two sanctioning schemes: peer-to-peer (informal) or centralized (formal). We introduce, in some treatments, a moderate amount of noise (a 10 percent probability that a contribution is reported incorrectly) affecting either one or both sanctioning environments. We find that the institution with more accurate information is always by far the most popular, but noisy information undermines the popularity of peer-to-peer sanctions more strongly than that of centralized sanctions. This may contribute to explaining the greater reliance on centralized sanctioning institutions in complex environments.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Working Paper ; No. 2017-2

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Public Goods
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Thema
Public goods
sanctions
information
institution
voting

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Markussen, Thomas
Putterman, Louis G.
Wang, Liangjun
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Brown University, Department of Economics
(wo)
Providence, RI
(wann)
2017

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Markussen, Thomas
  • Putterman, Louis G.
  • Wang, Liangjun
  • Brown University, Department of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2017

Ähnliche Objekte (12)