Arbeitspapier

Same Process, Different Outcomes: Group Performance in an Acquiring a Company Experiment

It is still an open question when groups perform better than individuals in intellective tasks. We report that in an Acquiring a Company game, what prevailed when there was disagreement among group members was the median proposal and not the best proposal. This aggregation rule explains why groups underperformed with respect to a "truth wins" benchmark and why they performed better than individuals deciding in isolation in a simple version of the task but worse in the more difficult version. Implications are drawn on when to employ groups rather than individuals in decision making.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 9614

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Thema
winner's curse
group decision making
communication
risky shift
herd behavior

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Casari, Marco
Zhang, Jingjing
Jackson, Christine
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2015

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:41 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Casari, Marco
  • Zhang, Jingjing
  • Jackson, Christine
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2015

Ähnliche Objekte (12)