Arbeitspapier
Same Process, Different Outcomes: Group Performance in an Acquiring a Company Experiment
It is still an open question when groups perform better than individuals in intellective tasks. We report that in an Acquiring a Company game, what prevailed when there was disagreement among group members was the median proposal and not the best proposal. This aggregation rule explains why groups underperformed with respect to a "truth wins" benchmark and why they performed better than individuals deciding in isolation in a simple version of the task but worse in the more difficult version. Implications are drawn on when to employ groups rather than individuals in decision making.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 9614
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
- Thema
-
winner's curse
group decision making
communication
risky shift
herd behavior
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Casari, Marco
Zhang, Jingjing
Jackson, Christine
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
- (wo)
-
Bonn
- (wann)
-
2015
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:41 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Casari, Marco
- Zhang, Jingjing
- Jackson, Christine
- Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Entstanden
- 2015