Arbeitspapier

Same Process, Different Outcomes: Group Performance in an Acquiring a Company Experiment

It is still an open question when groups perform better than individuals in intellective tasks. We report that in an Acquiring a Company game, what prevailed when there was disagreement among group members was the median proposal and not the best proposal. This aggregation rule explains why groups underperformed with respect to a "truth wins" benchmark and why they performed better than individuals deciding in isolation in a simple version of the task but worse in the more difficult version. Implications are drawn on when to employ groups rather than individuals in decision making.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 9614

Classification
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Subject
winner's curse
group decision making
communication
risky shift
herd behavior

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Casari, Marco
Zhang, Jingjing
Jackson, Christine
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(where)
Bonn
(when)
2015

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Casari, Marco
  • Zhang, Jingjing
  • Jackson, Christine
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Time of origin

  • 2015

Other Objects (12)