Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism

Abstract: It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from driving cars, living in apartments, and wearing makeup, for the welfare of animals. If all animals are equal, and if nonhuman omnivores, such as bears and baboons, are justified in killing the members of other species, such as gazelles and buffaloes, for food, humans are also justified in killing the members of other species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens, for food. In addition, it is fair for humans to eat animals because humans are also eaten by animals.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism ; volume:27 ; number:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:289-300 ; extent:12
Human affairs ; 27, Heft 3 (2017), 289-300 (gesamt 12)

Creator
Park, Seungbae

DOI
10.1515/humaff-2017-0024
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404271543536.501463112578
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
14.08.2025, 10:50 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Park, Seungbae

Other Objects (12)