Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism
Abstract: It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from driving cars, living in apartments, and wearing makeup, for the welfare of animals. If all animals are equal, and if nonhuman omnivores, such as bears and baboons, are justified in killing the members of other species, such as gazelles and buffaloes, for food, humans are also justified in killing the members of other species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens, for food. In addition, it is fair for humans to eat animals because humans are also eaten by animals.
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism ; volume:27 ; number:3 ; year:2017 ; pages:289-300 ; extent:12
Human affairs ; 27, Heft 3 (2017), 289-300 (gesamt 12)
- Creator
-
Park, Seungbae
- DOI
-
10.1515/humaff-2017-0024
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2404271543536.501463112578
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:50 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Park, Seungbae