Overponderabilia: Overcoming Overthinking When Studying "Ourselves"

Abstract: This article discusses a key methodological difficulty in conducting qualitative research close to home: the issue of overthinking. Whereas MALINOWSKI's concern regarding imponderabilia, i.e., the risk of not thinking about the subtle phenomena of everyday life, has long haunted ethnographers and qualitative researchers, not least those working "at home," we highlight an issue of overponderabilia, i.e., the risk of overthinking seemingly familiar statements and practices of the people studied. How do we, as qualitative researchers, study very well-known phenomena such as science, bureaucracy, management etc. without reading our own ideas and understandings into the deceptively familiar concepts and accounts of our research subjects? Pondering this issue is inevitably a central concern for the increasing number of qualitative researchers who study people who apparently talk, think and work in a way which is similar to their own. While previous answers or solutions to this issue firs.... https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2497

Object Details

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Overponderabilia: Overcoming Overthinking When Studying "Ourselves" ; volume:17 ; number:2 ; day:20 ; month:05 ; year:2016 ; Forum qualitative Sozialforschung ; 17, Heft 2 (20.05.2016)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Vangkilde, Kasper Tang ; Sausdal, David Brehm

Further information

• DOI: 10.17169/fqs-17.2.2497
• URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1602281
• Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Last update: 15.08.2025, 7:22 AM CEST