Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

to related objects

Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main

ISSN: 1432-1238

Extent: Online-Ressource

Language: Englisch

Notes: online resource.

Bibliographic citation: Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine ; volume:40 ; number:12 ; day:13 ; month:11 ; year:2014 ; pages:1795-1815 ; date:12.2014
Intensive care medicine ; 40, Heft 12 (13.11.2014), 1795-1815, 12.2014

Creator: Cecconi, Maurizio
Backer, Daniel De
Antonelli, Massimo
Beale, Richard
Bakker, Jan
Hofer, Christoph
Jaeschke, Roman
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Pinsky, Michael R.
Teboul, Jean Louis
Vincent, Jean Louis
Rhodes, Andrew

Contributor: SpringerLink (Online service)

DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z

URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019102714002572551819

Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.

Last update: 15.08.2025, 7:39 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Associated

Cecconi, Maurizio
Backer, Daniel De
Antonelli, Massimo
Beale, Richard
Bakker, Jan
Hofer, Christoph
Jaeschke, Roman
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Pinsky, Michael R.
Teboul, Jean Louis
Vincent, Jean Louis
Rhodes, Andrew
SpringerLink (Online service)

Other Objects (12)

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Object Details

References and Relationships

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Associated

Other Objects (12)

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute cardiogenic shock

Renal autoregulation and blood pressure management in circulatory shock

Distinct host-response signatures in circulatory shock: a narrative review

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Predicting Hemodynamic Shock from Thermal Images using Machine Learning

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art

Scrutinizing mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: Have we jumped the gun?

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non‐ischaemic cardiogenic shock

Related objects

Reset password