Moral Consensus and Antiestablishment Politics

Arbeitspapier

This essay argues that mainstream Left and Right parties' convergence around the liberal moral foundations of care, fairness, and liberty most likely explains the popular discontent with establishment politicians and the ascendancy of insurgent political parties and movements in both Europe and the United States. It uses the moral consensus of two Swedish establishment parties, the Social Democratic Party and the right-wing Moderate Party, as its primary example. The convergence of those parties can be seen, for instance, in their approach to both education and immigration. The essay suggests that in order to win back wide public support, liberal Left and Right parties must become open to moral pluralism and acknowledge the legitimacy of conservative moral intuitions. Such pluralism would, in fact, be consistent with the traditions of liberalism.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: IFN Working Paper ; No. 1389

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Relation of Economics to Social Values ; Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement ; Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: General ; Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making‡ ; Economic Impacts of Globalization: General ; Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: Public Policy
• Subject: Hedgehog-fox metaphor ; Moderate Party ; Moral foundations theory ; Policy convergence ; Social Democratic Party

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Wennström, Johan
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN)
• (where): Stockholm
• (when): 2021

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/240532
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET