Writing to Transgress: Knowledge Production in Feminist Participatory Action Research

Abstract: The process of writing and the textual form and format that scientific knowledge takes tend to be organized by traditional rules for knowledge production that are reinforced in the publication arena. Too often participatory action researchers must adhere to scholarly writing conventions that may be at odds with the epistemic stance and discursive claims of the feminist researchers who produce them. In this article, we reflect on our experience of writing to transgress conventions for scholarly writing using a previously published paper about and with a lone mother living in poverty. In our examination of this case study we argue that our writing process and the transgressive textual form and format we used were a more authentic reflection of our epistemic stance as critical realists and more consistent with the principles and assumptions underpinning feminist participatory action research—assumptions that privilege power-sharing, voice, subjectivity and reflexivity. We also show ho.... https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3164

Show object

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Writing to Transgress: Knowledge Production in Feminist Participatory Action Research ; volume:20 ; number:2 ; day:25 ; month:05 ; year:2019 ; Forum qualitative Sozialforschung ; 20, Heft 2 (25.05.2019)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Gustafson, Diana L. ; Parsons, Janice E. ; Gillingham, Brenda

Further information

• DOI: 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3164
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022011410031426254339
• Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.