Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:15 ; month:12 ; year:2016 ; pages:1-12 ; date:12.2016
BMC medical research methodology ; 16, Heft 1 (15.12.2016), 1-12, 12.2016
- Creator
-
Odendaal, Willem
- Contributor
-
Atkins, Salla
Lewin, Simon
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-016-0273-5
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201701115153
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:57 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Odendaal, Willem
- Atkins, Salla
- Lewin, Simon
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
The provision of TB and HIV/AIDS treatment support by lay health workers in South Africa: a time-and-motion study
Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa
Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization
The growth of a culture of evidence-based obstetrics in South Africa: a qualitative case study
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers
Expanding the evidence base for global recommendations on health systems: strengths and challenges of the OptimizeMNH guidance process
Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a qualitative process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication
Implementing a provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) intervention in Cape town, South Africa: a process evaluation using the normalisation process model
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 3. Programme governance
Applying the intervention Complexity Assessment Tool to brief interventions targeting long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in primary care: Lessons learned
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review
The provision of TB and HIV/AIDS treatment support by lay health workers in South Africa: a time-and-motion study
Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa
Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization
The growth of a culture of evidence-based obstetrics in South Africa: a qualitative case study
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers
Expanding the evidence base for global recommendations on health systems: strengths and challenges of the OptimizeMNH guidance process
Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a qualitative process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication
Implementing a provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) intervention in Cape town, South Africa: a process evaluation using the normalisation process model
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 3. Programme governance
Applying the intervention Complexity Assessment Tool to brief interventions targeting long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in primary care: Lessons learned
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review
The provision of TB and HIV/AIDS treatment support by lay health workers in South Africa: a time-and-motion study
Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa
Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization
The growth of a culture of evidence-based obstetrics in South Africa: a qualitative case study
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers
Expanding the evidence base for global recommendations on health systems: strengths and challenges of the OptimizeMNH guidance process
Economic support to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes in South Africa: a qualitative process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication
Implementing a provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) intervention in Cape town, South Africa: a process evaluation using the normalisation process model
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 3. Programme governance
Applying the intervention Complexity Assessment Tool to brief interventions targeting long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist use in primary care: Lessons learned