Democratization, quality of institutions and economic growth

Arbeitspapier

There are two innovations in the paper as compared to the previous literature on democracy and growth. First, we consider not only the level of democracy, but also changes in this level in the 1970s-1990s as measured by increments of Freedom House political rights indices. Second, the distinction is made between democracy and law and order (order based on legal rules); the latter is measured by the rule of law, investors' risk and corruption indices. We discuss two interconnected threshold hypotheses: (1) in countries where law and order is strong enough, democratization stimulates economic growth, whereas in countries with poor law and order democratization undermines growth; (2) if democratization occurs under the conditions of poor law and order (so that illiberal democracy emerges), then shadow economy expands, quality of governance worsens, and macroeconomic policy becomes less prudent. We adduce a number of stylized facts to support our hypotheses. However our econometric findings are mixed: we report results that support the hypotheses as well as regressions that contradict them.

Angaben zum Objekt

• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Series: TIGER Working Paper Series ; No. 102

Klassifikation und Themen

• Klassifikation: Wirtschaft
• Thema: Economic growth ; Democracy ; Rule of law ; Demokratisierung ; Rechtsstaat ; Wirtschaftswachstum ; Ökonomische Theorie der Demokratie ; Schätzung ; Welt

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Ereignis: Geistige Schöpfung
• (wer): Polterovich, Victor ; Popov, Vladimir
• Ereignis: Veröffentlichung
• (wer): Transformation, Integration and Globalization Economic Research (TIGER)
• (wo): Warsaw
• (wann): 2007

Weitere Informationen

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/140754
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ