Bericht
From reality to virtuality. Moving stakeholder dialogues from face-to-face to online formats
Virtualization is one of the big buzzwords in communications. When formats are moved from real-world settings to online environments a variety of challenges emerge - especially when it comes to confidential interactions and personal relationships with key stakeholders. A research team at Leipzig University investigated the extent to which in-person formats can be virtualized based on the following questions: - What are advantages and disadvantages of virtual stakeholder dialogues? - Which factors need to be considered if virtual stakeholder dialogues are to be successful?
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Communication Insights ; No. 12
- Klassifikation
-
Management
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Ziegele, Daniel
Kurtze, Hannah
Zerfaß, Ansgar
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Academic Society for Management & Communication
- (wo)
-
Leipzig
- (wann)
-
2021
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Bericht
Beteiligte
- Ziegele, Daniel
- Kurtze, Hannah
- Zerfaß, Ansgar
- Academic Society for Management & Communication
Entstanden
- 2021
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Mediation in Teletandem: from face-to-face sessions to reflective journals
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Mediation in Teletandem: from face-to-face sessions to reflective journals
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Mediation in Teletandem: from face-to-face sessions to reflective journals
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Why Should Face-to-Face Meetings Need to Resume?
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?