Arbeitspapier

Reactivity in Economic Science

There is a fundamental difference between the natural and the social sciences due to reactivity. This difference remains even in the age of Artificially Intelligent Learning Machines and Big Data. Many academic economists take it as a matter of course that economics should become a natural science. Such a characterization misses an essential aspect of a social science, namely reactivity, i.e. human beings systematically respond to economic data, and in particular to interventions by economic policy, in a foreseeable way. To illustrate this finding, I use three examples from quite different fields: Happiness policy, World Heritage policy, and Science policy.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: CREMA Working Paper ; No. 2017-10

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
General Economics: General
Economic Methodology: General
Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General
Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs: General
Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty: General
Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology: General
Thema
Economics
Social
Natural Science
Reactivity
Data
Happiness
Economic Policy

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Frey, Bruno S.
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)
(wo)
Zürich
(wann)
2017

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
2025-03-10T11:43:12+0100

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Frey, Bruno S.
  • Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)

Entstanden

  • 2017

Ähnliche Objekte (12)