Correction to: Enhancing task‑demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short‑term task‑switching training
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1430-2772
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Correction to: Enhancing task‑demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short‑term task‑switching training ; volume:85 ; number:6 ; day:21 ; month:7 ; year:2021 ; pages:2483 ; date:9.2021
Psychological research ; 85, Heft 6 (21.7.2021), 2483, 9.2021
- Creator
-
Sabah, Katrina
Dolk, Thomas
Meiran, Nachshon
Dreisbach, Gesine
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s00426-021-01557-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021110101250571289519
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:29 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Sabah, Katrina
- Dolk, Thomas
- Meiran, Nachshon
- Dreisbach, Gesine
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Task Dominance Determines Backward Inhibition in Task Switching
Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings : Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching
Neural correlates of affective task switching and asymmetric affective task switching costs
Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
No-go trials in task switching: effects on the task-set and task-space level
The causes and consequences of task-selection failures in task switching
The “tweaking principle” for task switching
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching : an assessment of different paradigms
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching: an assessment of different paradigms
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands
Inhibition during task switching is affected by the number of competing tasks
Task Dominance Determines Backward Inhibition in Task Switching
Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings : Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching
Neural correlates of affective task switching and asymmetric affective task switching costs
Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
No-go trials in task switching: effects on the task-set and task-space level
The causes and consequences of task-selection failures in task switching
The “tweaking principle” for task switching
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching : an assessment of different paradigms
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching: an assessment of different paradigms
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands
Inhibition during task switching is affected by the number of competing tasks
Task Dominance Determines Backward Inhibition in Task Switching
Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings : Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching
Neural correlates of affective task switching and asymmetric affective task switching costs
Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching
No-go trials in task switching: effects on the task-set and task-space level
The causes and consequences of task-selection failures in task switching
The “tweaking principle” for task switching
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching : an assessment of different paradigms
Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching: an assessment of different paradigms
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching
Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands