Arbeitspapier

Downward Nominal Wage Flexibility : Real or Measurement Error?

This paper presents a new method to correct for measurement error in wage data and applies this method to address an old question. How much downward wage flexibility is there in the U.S? We apply standard methods developed by Bai and Perron (1998b) to identify structural breaks in time series data. Applying these methods to wage histories allows us to identify when each person experienced a change in nominal wages. The length of the period of constant nominal wages is left unrestricted and is allowed to differ across individuals, as is the size and direction of the nominal wage change. We apply these methods to data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. The evidence we provide indicates that the probability of a cut in nominal wages is substantially overstated in data that is not corrected for measurement error.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 1327

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: Public Policy
Thema
nominal wage rigidity
measurement error
Lohnrigidität
Messung
Statistischer Fehler
Schätzung
Vereinigte Staaten

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Gottschalk, Peter
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2004

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Gottschalk, Peter
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2004

Ähnliche Objekte (12)