Ethical guidance for reporting and evaluating claims of AI outperforming human doctors
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Ethical guidance for reporting and evaluating claims of AI outperforming human doctors ; volume:7 ; number:1 ; day:2 ; month:10 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-4 ; date:12.2024
npj digital medicine ; 7, Heft 1 (2.10.2024), 1-4, 12.2024
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Creator
-
Drogt, Jojanneke
Milota, Megan
Brink, Anne van den
Jongsma, Karin
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1038/s41746-024-01255-w
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2412192104580.219481385870
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:20 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Drogt, Jojanneke
- Milota, Megan
- Brink, Anne van den
- Jongsma, Karin
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet
COVID-19: where is the national ethical guidance?
Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit
Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology
Safety Claims development based on Ethical Aspects for Automated Driving Systems
Health-Economic Analyses of Diagnostics: Guidance on Design and Reporting
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium Guidance
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet
COVID-19: where is the national ethical guidance?
Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit
Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology
Safety Claims development based on Ethical Aspects for Automated Driving Systems
Health-Economic Analyses of Diagnostics: Guidance on Design and Reporting
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium Guidance
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
Mind-reading in AI and neurotechnology: evaluating claims, hype, and ethical implications for neurorights
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet
COVID-19: where is the national ethical guidance?
Reporting transparency: making the ethical mandate explicit
Reporting and evaluating genetic association studies
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology
Safety Claims development based on Ethical Aspects for Automated Driving Systems
Health-Economic Analyses of Diagnostics: Guidance on Design and Reporting
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium Guidance