Arbeitspapier
Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?
Many scholars have argued that once basic needs have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of basic needs and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 7353
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
- Thema
-
subjective well-being
happiness
satiation
basic needs
Easterlin paradox
Zufriedenheit
Lebensstandard
Einkommen
Sozialprodukt
Wirtschaftswachstum
Entwicklung
Vergleich
Welt
Glücksforschung
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Stevenson, Betsey
Wolfers, Justin
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
- (wo)
-
Bonn
- (wann)
-
2013
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Stevenson, Betsey
- Wolfers, Justin
- Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Entstanden
- 2013