Arbeitspapier

Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?

Many scholars have argued that once basic needs have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of basic needs and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: IZA Discussion Papers ; No. 7353

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Thema
subjective well-being
happiness
satiation
basic needs
Easterlin paradox
Zufriedenheit
Lebensstandard
Einkommen
Sozialprodukt
Wirtschaftswachstum
Entwicklung
Vergleich
Welt
Glücksforschung

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Stevenson, Betsey
Wolfers, Justin
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
(wo)
Bonn
(wann)
2013

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Stevenson, Betsey
  • Wolfers, Justin
  • Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Entstanden

  • 2013

Ähnliche Objekte (12)