Premature discontinuation of prospective clinical studies approved by a research ethics committee : a comparison of randomised and non-randomised studies
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
In: PLoS ONE 11,10 (2016), e0165605. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165605 (ISSN: 1932-6203)
- Keyword
-
Iatrogene Krankheit
Therapie
Compliance
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Freiburg
- (who)
-
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- (when)
-
2016
- Creator
-
Blümle, Anette
Schandelmaier, Stefan
Oeller, Patrick
Kasenda, Benjamin
Briel, Matthias
Elm, Erik von
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-freidok-117064
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:53 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Blümle, Anette
- Schandelmaier, Stefan
- Oeller, Patrick
- Kasenda, Benjamin
- Briel, Matthias
- Elm, Erik von
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Time of origin
- 2016
Other Objects (12)
Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies
Hierarchical network meta-analysis models for synthesis of evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies
Randomised and non-randomised studies to estimate the effect of community-level public health interventions: definitions and methodological considerations
Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Evidence synthesis based on non-randomised studies—a critical review of studies leading to conclusions on fall risk properties of loop diuretics/beta-blockers
Interventions to improve medicines optimisation in frail older patients in secondary and acute care settings: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies
Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes
The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms
Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment
Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis
Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies
Hierarchical network meta-analysis models for synthesis of evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies
Randomised and non-randomised studies to estimate the effect of community-level public health interventions: definitions and methodological considerations
Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Evidence synthesis based on non-randomised studies—a critical review of studies leading to conclusions on fall risk properties of loop diuretics/beta-blockers
Interventions to improve medicines optimisation in frail older patients in secondary and acute care settings: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies
Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes
The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms
Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment
Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis
Guidelines for reporting non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies
Hierarchical network meta-analysis models for synthesis of evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies
Randomised and non-randomised studies to estimate the effect of community-level public health interventions: definitions and methodological considerations
Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Evidence synthesis based on non-randomised studies—a critical review of studies leading to conclusions on fall risk properties of loop diuretics/beta-blockers
Interventions to improve medicines optimisation in frail older patients in secondary and acute care settings: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies
Non-randomised patients in a cholecystectomy trial: characteristics, procedures, and outcomes
The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms
Risk of cancer development associated with disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment