The good governance indicators of the millennium challenge account: How many dimensions are really being measured?

Arbeitspapier

This paper assesses the validity of the perception-based governance indicators used by the US Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) for aid allocation decisions. By conducting Explanatory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of data from 1996 to 2009, we find that although the MCA purports to measure seven distinct dimensions of governance, only two discrete underlying dimensions, the perceived 'participatory dimension of governance' and the perceived 'overall quality of governance,' can be identified. Our results also show that some of the doubts that have been raised concerning the validity of perception-based governance indicators are less warranted when the indicators are applied exclusively to developing countries.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: DIW Discussion Papers ; No. 1148

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models: Classification Methods; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Models ; Foreign Aid ; Economic Development: General ; Economywide Country Studies: U.S.; Canada
• Subject: Aid Allocation ; Governance Indicators ; Factor Analysis ; MCA ; United States ; Entwicklungshilfekonditionen ; Good Governance ; Messung ; Millennium Development Goals ; USA

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Knoll, Martin ; Zloczysti, Petra
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW)
• (where): Berlin
• (when): 2011

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57255
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET