Arbeitspapier

Tactical refereeing and signaling by publishing

A peer review is used ubiquitously in hiring, promotional, and evaluation decisions, within academia and beyond. It is usually conducted to allocate limited resources, such as the budget of a funder or the pages of a journal. With limited capacity, a peer review may lead to negatively biased evaluations precisely because approving a peer's worthy project lowers the chance that a referee's own project will be approved. I show that limited capacity is inconsistent with a hypothesis that the decision-maker's policy is to stimulate efforts, and I discuss possible decision-maker motivations that could lead to a limited capacity policy.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Cardiff Economics Working Papers ; No. E2022/14

Classification
Wirtschaft
Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
Subject
refereeing
peer review

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Popov, Sergey V.
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School
(where)
Cardiff
(when)
2022

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Popov, Sergey V.
  • Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School

Time of origin

  • 2022

Other Objects (12)