- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Lessons from controversy: biomarkers evaluation ; volume:51 ; number:2 ; year:2013 ; pages:247-248 ; extent:2
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine ; 51, Heft 2 (2013), 247-248 (gesamt 2)
- Creator
- DOI
-
10.1515/cclm-2013-0012
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022061812221695153665
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:21 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
Other Objects (12)
Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Component-resolved diagnostics: laboratory results are not enough
Clinical laboratory: bigger is not always better
Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Component-resolved diagnostics: laboratory results are not enough
Clinical laboratory: bigger is not always better
Laboratory medicine in the COVID-19 era: six lessons for the future
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Component-resolved diagnostics: laboratory results are not enough