Bericht
An International Investment Court: panacea or purgatory?
EU officials have proposed the establishment of a permanent court for investment disputes. But there is no guarantee that bias, the reason for the lacking legitimacy of investment arbitration, does not affect judges. This Perspective suggests that it may be preferable for investment disputes to be settled by domestic courts.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Columbia FDI Perspectives ; No. 180
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Sornarajah, M.
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
- (where)
-
New York, NY
- (when)
-
2016
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Bericht
Associated
- Sornarajah, M.
- Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI)
Time of origin
- 2016
Other Objects (12)
The EU proposal for an Investment Court System: what lessons can be learned from the Arab Investment Court?
Challenges on the road toward a multilateral investment court
The EU investment court: challenges on the path ahead
Italy's banking crisis: Creditor bail-in is no panacea
Is international investment threatening or under threat?
Budget support as an aid instrument: neither pandemonium nor panacea
Friends or foes? Interactions between Indonesia’s international investment agreements and national investment law
Guaranteeing the independence of the judges of a Multilateral Investment Court: A must for building the Court's credibility
The nationality of the international judge: Policy options for the Multilateral Investment Court
The case for a multilateral or plurilateral framework on investment
The public law challenge: Killing or rethinking international investment law?
Improving infrastructure or lowering taxes to attract foreign direct investment?
The EU proposal for an Investment Court System: what lessons can be learned from the Arab Investment Court?
Challenges on the road toward a multilateral investment court
The EU investment court: challenges on the path ahead
Italy's banking crisis: Creditor bail-in is no panacea
Is international investment threatening or under threat?
Budget support as an aid instrument: neither pandemonium nor panacea
Friends or foes? Interactions between Indonesia’s international investment agreements and national investment law
Guaranteeing the independence of the judges of a Multilateral Investment Court: A must for building the Court's credibility
The nationality of the international judge: Policy options for the Multilateral Investment Court
The case for a multilateral or plurilateral framework on investment
The public law challenge: Killing or rethinking international investment law?
Improving infrastructure or lowering taxes to attract foreign direct investment?
The EU proposal for an Investment Court System: what lessons can be learned from the Arab Investment Court?
Challenges on the road toward a multilateral investment court
The EU investment court: challenges on the path ahead
Italy's banking crisis: Creditor bail-in is no panacea
Is international investment threatening or under threat?
Budget support as an aid instrument: neither pandemonium nor panacea
Friends or foes? Interactions between Indonesia’s international investment agreements and national investment law
Guaranteeing the independence of the judges of a Multilateral Investment Court: A must for building the Court's credibility
The nationality of the international judge: Policy options for the Multilateral Investment Court
The case for a multilateral or plurilateral framework on investment
The public law challenge: Killing or rethinking international investment law?