The colonial origins of comparative development: a skeptical note

Abstract: "This note casts skepticism over various hypothesis formulated by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) in reaching the conclusion that institutions cause economic development. The author has identified four major issues in the study. It lacks adequate econometric specification and relies only on, what the author termed, destiny variables. Secondly, the historical record does not support the author's theory that mortality rate determine Europeans strategy for institutions they intended to develop in the host country; thirdly, given current living standards and disease ridden environment in low and middle income countries, the claim that disease environment of early 19th century was neutral to economic development seems farfetched; finally, assuming that initial institutions caused present institutions put in question the developmental efforts of past half century and thus is more than a sweeping generalization." (author's abstract)

Weitere Titel
Die Kolonialursprünge der vergleichenden Entwicklungsforschung: eine skeptische Anmerkung
Standort
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Umfang
Online-Ressource
Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
The colonial origins of comparative development: a skeptical note ; volume:37 ; number:2 ; year:2012 ; pages:362-370
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Historical social research ; 37, Heft 2 (2012), 362-370

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Geschichte

Urheber
Mazhar, Ummad

DOI
10.12759/hsr.37.2012.2.362-370
URN
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-372982
Rechteinformation
Open Access; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Letzte Aktualisierung
14.08.2025, 10:59 MESZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Beteiligte

  • Mazhar, Ummad

Ähnliche Objekte (12)