Arbeitspapier

Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets

Feedback withdrawal mechanisms in online markets aim to facilitate the resolution of conflicts during transactions. Yet, frequently used online feedback withdrawal rules are flawed and may backfire by inviting strategic transaction and feedback behavior. Our laboratory experiment shows how a small change in the design of feedback withdrawal rules, allowing unilateral rather than mutual withdrawal, can both reduce incentives for strategic gaming and improve coordination of expectations. This leads to less trading risk, more cooperation, and higher market efficiency.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: ECONtribute Discussion Paper ; No. 070

Classification
Wirtschaft
Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
Subject
dispute resolution system
market design
reputation
trust

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Bolton, Gary E.
Breuer, Kevin
Greiner, Ben
Ockenfels, Axel
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Reinhard Selten Institute (RSI)
(where)
Bonn and Cologne
(when)
2021

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Bolton, Gary E.
  • Breuer, Kevin
  • Greiner, Ben
  • Ockenfels, Axel
  • University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Reinhard Selten Institute (RSI)

Time of origin

  • 2021

Other Objects (12)