Arbeitspapier
Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets
Feedback withdrawal mechanisms in online markets aim to facilitate the resolution of conflicts during transactions. Yet, frequently used online feedback withdrawal rules are flawed and may backfire by inviting strategic transaction and feedback behavior. Our laboratory experiment shows how a small change in the design of feedback withdrawal rules, allowing unilateral rather than mutual withdrawal, can both reduce incentives for strategic gaming and improve coordination of expectations. This leads to less trading risk, more cooperation, and higher market efficiency.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: ECONtribute Discussion Paper ; No. 070
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation; Networks
- Subject
-
dispute resolution system
market design
reputation
trust
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Bolton, Gary E.
Breuer, Kevin
Greiner, Ben
Ockenfels, Axel
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Reinhard Selten Institute (RSI)
- (where)
-
Bonn and Cologne
- (when)
-
2021
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Bolton, Gary E.
- Breuer, Kevin
- Greiner, Ben
- Ockenfels, Axel
- University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Reinhard Selten Institute (RSI)
Time of origin
- 2021