Not all LGE is the same. Scar contrast volume of distribution is lower in HCM than in infarction
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1532-429X
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Not all LGE is the same. Scar contrast volume of distribution is lower in HCM than in infarction ; volume:14 ; number:1 ; day:1 ; month:2 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-2 ; date:12.2012
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance ; 14, Heft 1 (1.2.2012), 1-2, 12.2012
- Urheber
-
Treibel, Thomas A.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
White, Steven K.
Sado, Daniel
Hasleton, Jonathan
Flett, Andrew
Herrey, Anna S.
Hausenloy, Derek J.
Moon, James
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1532-429X-14-S1-O95
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032221418
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Treibel, Thomas A.
- White, Steven K.
- Sado, Daniel
- Hasleton, Jonathan
- Flett, Andrew
- Herrey, Anna S.
- Hausenloy, Derek J.
- Moon, James
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Myocardial scar surface area identified by LGE MRI is an independent predictor of mortality in post-infarction patients
Presence of transmural posterolateral scar by LGE MRI is associated with non-response to CRT
Fully Automatic Segmentation of Anatomy and Scar from LGE-MRI
Scar revison is a useless operation
Scar revison is a useless operation
Isotropic 3D compressed sensing (CS) based sequence is comparable to 2D-LGE in left ventricular scar quantification in different disease entities
What is fair is not the same everywhere
Everywhere is becoming the same?
Is all bullying the same?
Change in scar visibility in LGE-MRI with time after RF ablation procedure
Dependence of scar contrast in LGE images on the time interval after contrast injection
Scar revision is a useless operation (Opposing the statement)
Myocardial scar surface area identified by LGE MRI is an independent predictor of mortality in post-infarction patients
Presence of transmural posterolateral scar by LGE MRI is associated with non-response to CRT
Fully Automatic Segmentation of Anatomy and Scar from LGE-MRI
Scar revison is a useless operation
Scar revison is a useless operation
Isotropic 3D compressed sensing (CS) based sequence is comparable to 2D-LGE in left ventricular scar quantification in different disease entities
What is fair is not the same everywhere
Everywhere is becoming the same?
Is all bullying the same?
Change in scar visibility in LGE-MRI with time after RF ablation procedure
Dependence of scar contrast in LGE images on the time interval after contrast injection
Scar revision is a useless operation (Opposing the statement)
Myocardial scar surface area identified by LGE MRI is an independent predictor of mortality in post-infarction patients
Presence of transmural posterolateral scar by LGE MRI is associated with non-response to CRT
Fully Automatic Segmentation of Anatomy and Scar from LGE-MRI
Scar revison is a useless operation
Scar revison is a useless operation
Isotropic 3D compressed sensing (CS) based sequence is comparable to 2D-LGE in left ventricular scar quantification in different disease entities
What is fair is not the same everywhere
Everywhere is becoming the same?
Is all bullying the same?
Change in scar visibility in LGE-MRI with time after RF ablation procedure
Dependence of scar contrast in LGE images on the time interval after contrast injection