Comparing price and non-price approaches to urban water conservation

Arbeitspapier

Urban water conservation is typically achieved through prescriptive regulations, including the rationing of water for particular uses and requirements for the installation of particular technologies. A significant shift has occurred in pollution control regulations toward market-based policies in recent decades. We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non-price conservation programs, similar to results for pollution control in earlier decades. Price-based approaches also have advantages in terms of monitoring and enforcement. In terms of predictability and equity, neither policy instrument has an inherent advantage over the other. As in any policy context, political considerations are important.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: Nota di Lavoro ; No. 66.2008

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Renewable Resources and Conservation: Water ; Renewable Resources and Conservation: Government Policy ; Environmental Economics: Government Policy ; Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities
• Subject: Cost-effectiveness ; Water Conservation ; Market-based Approaches ; Policy Instrument Choice ; Water Price

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Olmstead, Sheila M. ; Stavins, Robert N.
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)
• (where): Milano
• (when): 2008

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53372
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET