Arbeitspapier

Scientists' opinion, attitudes, and consensus towards immunity passports

We designed and implemented a survey to capture what scientists from around the world think about immunity certification. Responses from 12,738 scientists were captured and their distribution was tabulated by participants in health science and other fields. Half of the scientists surveyed agree that a potential immunity passport program will be good for public health (50.2%) and the economy (54.4%), with 19.1% and 15.4% of participants disagree, respectively. A significant proportion of scientists raised concerns about immunity certification over fairness to others (36.5%) and social inequality (45.5%). There is little consensus in the different aspects of immunity passport among scientists.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: CREMA Working Paper ; No. 2021-03

Classification
Wirtschaft

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Aranzales, Iván
Chan, Ho Fai
Eichenberger, Reiner
Hegselmann, Rainer
Stadelmann, David
Torgler, Benno
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)
(where)
Zürich
(when)
2021

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Aranzales, Iván
  • Chan, Ho Fai
  • Eichenberger, Reiner
  • Hegselmann, Rainer
  • Stadelmann, David
  • Torgler, Benno
  • Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)

Time of origin

  • 2021

Other Objects (12)