Arbeitspapier
Norm elicitation in within-subject designs: Testing for order effects
We investigate norms of corruption using the norm-elicitation procedure introduced by Krupka and Weber (2013). We use a within-subject design whereby the norms are elicited from the same subjects who are observed making choices in a bribery game. We test whether the order in which the norm-elicitation task and the bribery game are conducted affects elicited norms and behavior. We find little evidence of order effects in our experiment.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: CeDEx Discussion Paper Series ; No. 2015-02
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
- Subject
-
social norms
norm elicitation
order effects
within-subject design
corruption
bribe game
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
D'Adda, Giovanna
Drouvelis, Michalis
Nosenzo, Daniele
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx)
- (where)
-
Nottingham
- (when)
-
2015
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- D'Adda, Giovanna
- Drouvelis, Michalis
- Nosenzo, Daniele
- The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx)
Time of origin
- 2015
Other Objects (12)
On the Robustness of Social Norm Elicitation
On the robustness of social norm elicitation
STELA: a community-centred approach to norm elicitation for AI alignment
Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
Constrained preference elicitation
Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
Modeling between-subject differences and within-subject changes for long distance runners by age
Varieties of risk elicitation
Online Belief Elicitation Methods
Varieties of risk elicitation
On the Robustness of Social Norm Elicitation
On the robustness of social norm elicitation
STELA: a community-centred approach to norm elicitation for AI alignment
Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
Constrained preference elicitation
Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
Modeling between-subject differences and within-subject changes for long distance runners by age
Varieties of risk elicitation
Online Belief Elicitation Methods
Varieties of risk elicitation
On the Robustness of Social Norm Elicitation
On the robustness of social norm elicitation
STELA: a community-centred approach to norm elicitation for AI alignment
Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
Constrained preference elicitation
Testing Willingness to Pay Elicitation Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Uganda
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences
Modeling between-subject differences and within-subject changes for long distance runners by age
Varieties of risk elicitation
Online Belief Elicitation Methods