Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Abstract: In this contribution for debate, I attempt to do a critical anthropology of research funding at one national council, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. In this, I follow its own paradigmatic inscription on the cover of the "Manual for Adjudication Committee Members" (which regulates funding related evaluation and adjudication at the Social Sciences Research Council of Canada) and take "a closer look," an inspection de plus près, at its process, the vagaries and politics included. To guide my anthropological investigation, I draw on different social science theories, which I articulate in terms of the topologies they provide for structuring the social. I draw on a form of writing that integrates third- and first-person perspectives on the social processes of funding and the autobiographical experiences of being and not being funded. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203259. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/841
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding ; volume:3 ; number:3 ; day:30 ; month:09 ; year:2002
Forum qualitative Sozialforschung ; 3, Heft 3 (30.09.2002)
- Creator
-
Roth, Wolff-Michael
- DOI
-
10.17169/fqs-3.3.841
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0203259
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:26 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Roth, Wolff-Michael
Other Objects (12)
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication
Taxation und Adjudication
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication
Taxation und Adjudication
Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Letter to the Editors of FQS. About Wolff-Michael Roth: Evaluation and Adjudication of Research Proposals: Vagaries and Politics of Funding. Published in FQS 3(3)
Differentiating and linking politics and adjudication: The example of European electricity policy
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
Conventionality control of domestic law : constitutionalised international adjudication and internationalised constitutional adjudication
Conventionality Control of Domestic Law : Constitutionalised International Adjudication and Internationalised Constitutional Adjudication
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Vagaries and Politics of Funding: Beyond "I Told You So"
Gender Effects in Research Funding : A review of the scientific discussion on the gender-specific aspects of the evaluation of funding proposals and the awarding of funding
Taxation und Adjudication