Arbeitspapier
A comment on Galperti and Strulovici (2017)
The analysis in Galperti and Strulovici (2017) relies on two axioms that appear normatively and descriptively very appealing. Notably, these two axioms, taken together with some standard axioms, imply a failure of dynamic consistency. The current comment argues that the two axioms are less normatively and descriptively appealing than they seem. Thus, the challenge to dynamic consistency posed by Galperti and Strulovici is less convincing than it first appears.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Working Paper ; No. 920
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
Welfare Economics: General
Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
- Subject
-
intergenerational choice
intertemporal choice
dynamic consistency
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Ivanov, Asen
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
- (where)
-
London
- (when)
-
2021
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Ivanov, Asen
- Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance
Time of origin
- 2021
Other Objects (12)
A Comment on "Vulnerability and Clientelism" (2022)
A Comment on Sampson (2023)
A comment on "Sequential Equilibria"
A Comment on Alesina, Miano and Stancheva (2023)
A comment on Herzog, Baron, and Gibbons (2022)
Bargaining, coalitions and externalities: A comment on Maskin
Response to "Comment on Khanna (2023)"
Comments on Partial Adjustment Without Apology
Comment on: Electoral contests, incumbency advantages, and campaign finance
On the "utilization controversy": A rejoinder and some comments
Response to "A Comment on Vulnerability and Clientelism (2022)"
A Comment on the Environment and Directed Technical Change
A Comment on "Vulnerability and Clientelism" (2022)
A Comment on Sampson (2023)
A comment on "Sequential Equilibria"
A Comment on Alesina, Miano and Stancheva (2023)
A comment on Herzog, Baron, and Gibbons (2022)
Bargaining, coalitions and externalities: A comment on Maskin
Response to "Comment on Khanna (2023)"
Comments on Partial Adjustment Without Apology
Comment on: Electoral contests, incumbency advantages, and campaign finance
On the "utilization controversy": A rejoinder and some comments
Response to "A Comment on Vulnerability and Clientelism (2022)"
A Comment on the Environment and Directed Technical Change
A Comment on "Vulnerability and Clientelism" (2022)
A Comment on Sampson (2023)
A comment on "Sequential Equilibria"
A Comment on Alesina, Miano and Stancheva (2023)
A comment on Herzog, Baron, and Gibbons (2022)
Bargaining, coalitions and externalities: A comment on Maskin
Response to "Comment on Khanna (2023)"
Comments on Partial Adjustment Without Apology
Comment on: Electoral contests, incumbency advantages, and campaign finance
On the "utilization controversy": A rejoinder and some comments
Response to "A Comment on Vulnerability and Clientelism (2022)"