- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1573-7217
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Screening mammography: benefit of double reading by breast density ; volume:171 ; number:3 ; day:4 ; month:7 ; year:2018 ; pages:767-776 ; date:10.2018
Breast cancer research and treatment ; 171, Heft 3 (4.7.2018), 767-776, 10.2018
- Creator
-
Euler-Chelpin, My von
- Contributor
-
Lillholm, Martin
Napolitano, George
Vejborg, Ilse
Nielsen, Mads
Lynge, Elsebeth
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s10549-018-4864-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2018102114113877965051
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:23 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Euler-Chelpin, My von
- Lillholm, Martin
- Napolitano, George
- Vejborg, Ilse
- Nielsen, Mads
- Lynge, Elsebeth
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Mammography: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
High density trans-admittance mammography development and preliminary phantom tests
Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps
Practical digital mammography
Atlas of mammography
Assessing agreement between malaria slide density readings
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
Performance of AI-aided mammography in breast cancer diagnosis: Does breast density matter?
Double bass sight-reading : a fresh approach
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Mammography: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
High density trans-admittance mammography development and preliminary phantom tests
Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps
Practical digital mammography
Atlas of mammography
Assessing agreement between malaria slide density readings
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
Performance of AI-aided mammography in breast cancer diagnosis: Does breast density matter?
Double bass sight-reading : a fresh approach
Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography
Mammography: density equalizing mapping of the global research architecture
High density trans-admittance mammography development and preliminary phantom tests
Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps
Practical digital mammography
Atlas of mammography
Assessing agreement between malaria slide density readings
Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
Performance of AI-aided mammography in breast cancer diagnosis: Does breast density matter?
Double bass sight-reading : a fresh approach