Menschenrechtliche Grenzen für Pushbacks : und der weitergehende Schutz nach EU-Sekundärrecht
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Deutsch
- Anmerkungen
-
In: Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional
- Klassifikation
-
Recht
- Schlagwort
-
Grenze
Recht
Asyl
Asylverfahren
Refoulement-Verbot
Ägäis
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Berlin
- (wer)
-
Fachinformationsdienst für internationale und interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz
- (wann)
-
2021
- Urheber
- DOI
-
10.17176/20210517-211146-0
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0301-20210517-211146-0-4
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:44 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Thym, Daniel
- Fachinformationsdienst für internationale und interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz
Entstanden
- 2021
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Legal Framework for EU Immigration Policy
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Frontiers of EU Citizenship : Three Trajectories and their Methodological Foundations
EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale : A Cosmopolitan Outlook
Ambiguities of Personhood, Citizenship, Migration and Fundamental Rights in EU Law
EU Free Movement as a Legal Construction : not as Social Imagination
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Für ein ,Helsinki’ im deutschen Migrationsrechtsdiskurs
Legal Framework for EU Immigration Policy
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Frontiers of EU Citizenship : Three Trajectories and their Methodological Foundations
EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale : A Cosmopolitan Outlook
Ambiguities of Personhood, Citizenship, Migration and Fundamental Rights in EU Law
EU Free Movement as a Legal Construction : not as Social Imagination
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Für ein ,Helsinki’ im deutschen Migrationsrechtsdiskurs
Legal Framework for EU Immigration Policy
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Frontiers of EU Citizenship : Three Trajectories and their Methodological Foundations
EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale : A Cosmopolitan Outlook
Ambiguities of Personhood, Citizenship, Migration and Fundamental Rights in EU Law
EU Free Movement as a Legal Construction : not as Social Imagination
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice