Artikel

Why Do States Extend Rights to Immigrants? Institutional Settings and Historical Legacies Across 44 Countries Worldwide

In this article, we first test theories on immigrant rights across 29 countries from Europe, Africa, the Middle East, East Asia, Oceania, and the Americas, using our Indicators of Citizenship Rights for Immigrants (ICRI) data set. We focus on trajectories of nationhood and current institutional features to explain cross-national difference. We find that former colonial powers, former colonies that developed as settler countries, as well as democracies have been more likely to extend rights to immigrants. Strikingly, once we account for involvement in colonialism, we find no difference between supposedly “civic-nationalist” early nation-states and supposedly “ethnic-nationalist” latecomer nations, refuting a widely held belief in the literature on citizenship. We find no effect of a country’s degree of political globalization. We replicate these findings on a sample of 35 mainly European countries, using the migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX).

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Journal: Comparative Political Studies ; ISSN: 1552-3829 ; Volume: 50 ; Year: 2017 ; Issue: 1 ; Pages: 41-74 ; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
migration
globalization
citizenship rights
ethnic versus civic nationalism

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Koopmans, Ruud
Michalowski, Ines
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Sage
(where)
Thousand Oaks, CA
(when)
2017

DOI
doi:10.1177/0010414016655533
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Artikel

Associated

  • Koopmans, Ruud
  • Michalowski, Ines
  • Sage

Time of origin

  • 2017

Other Objects (12)