Arbeitspapier
Testing choquet expected utility
Many theories have been developed to model decision behavior under ambiguity. In this paper we empirically investigate theories which are based on non-additive probabilities, i.e. Choquet expected utility (CEU) theories. We first replicated Ellsberg-paradox behavior. Then we elicited the individual non-additive probabilities, the so called capacities. Those capacities did not have all properties theoretically required. Finally we found that CEU is not really superior to EU in predicting the participants' decisions.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel ; No. 285
- Classification
-
Management
- Subject
-
Ellsberg paradox
ambiguity
Choquet expected utility
non-additive probabilities
experimental economics
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Mangelsdorff, Lukas
Weber, Martin
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Universität Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre
ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
- (where)
-
Kiel
- (when)
-
1992
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Mangelsdorff, Lukas
- Weber, Martin
- Universität Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre
- ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
Time of origin
- 1992