Arbeitspapier

Testing choquet expected utility

Many theories have been developed to model decision behavior under ambiguity. In this paper we empirically investigate theories which are based on non-additive probabilities, i.e. Choquet expected utility (CEU) theories. We first replicated Ellsberg-paradox behavior. Then we elicited the individual non-additive probabilities, the so called capacities. Those capacities did not have all properties theoretically required. Finally we found that CEU is not really superior to EU in predicting the participants' decisions.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel ; No. 285

Classification
Management
Subject
Ellsberg paradox
ambiguity
Choquet expected utility
non-additive probabilities
experimental economics

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Mangelsdorff, Lukas
Weber, Martin
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Universität Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre
ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
(where)
Kiel
(when)
1992

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Mangelsdorff, Lukas
  • Weber, Martin
  • Universität Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre
  • ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics

Time of origin

  • 1992

Other Objects (12)