Teacher’s pet or rebel? Practitioners’ perspectives on the impacts of ChatGPT on course design
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
1 Online-Ressource.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Teacher’s pet or rebel? Practitioners’ perspectives on the impacts of ChatGPT on course design ; day:3 ; month:12 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-24
Higher education ; (3.12.2024), 1-24
- Classification
-
Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
- Creator
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s10734-024-01350-7
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2502172129248.949349341650
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:31 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Tran, Tri Mikael
- Bakajic, Misa
- Pullman, Madeleine
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
ChatGPT
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit
ChatGPT im Geschichtsunterricht
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
ChatGPT et al. : Was bedeutet ChatGPT für den wissenschaftlichen Schreibprozess?
Ethical considerations in working with ChatGPT on a questionnaire about the future of work with ChatGPT
Readability analysis of ChatGPT's responses on lung cancer
Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT’s Self-Reflection
ChatGPT
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit
ChatGPT im Geschichtsunterricht
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
ChatGPT et al. : Was bedeutet ChatGPT für den wissenschaftlichen Schreibprozess?
Ethical considerations in working with ChatGPT on a questionnaire about the future of work with ChatGPT
Readability analysis of ChatGPT's responses on lung cancer
Using ChatGPT in Education: Human Reflection on ChatGPT’s Self-Reflection
ChatGPT
ChatGPT in libraries
ChatGPT in Bibliotheken
30 Minuten ChatGPT
ChatGPT is bullshit
ChatGPT im Geschichtsunterricht
Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5
Evaluating GPT-4-based ChatGPT's clinical potential on the NEJM quiz
ChatGPT et al. : Was bedeutet ChatGPT für den wissenschaftlichen Schreibprozess?
Ethical considerations in working with ChatGPT on a questionnaire about the future of work with ChatGPT
Readability analysis of ChatGPT's responses on lung cancer