Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
This article analyses the interstate dispute settlement mechanisms between member states of the German Confederation (Deutscher Bund). The question as to how disputes between German sovereigns should be decided already had a long (pre-)history dating back to the Middle Ages. Article 11 IV of the German Federal Act (1815) (Bundesakte) was the basic norm of the so-called Austrägal jurisdiction enacted to resolve disputes between states of the German Confederation and stipulated the manner in which the dispute was to be brought to "court" (Austrägalinstanz). During the period of the German Confederation, 10 out of 25 German courts of third instance handled altogether 54 Austrägal cases. Whereas Austrägal jurisdiction was no longer present in the German Kaiserreich, Emperor William II and the professor of public law Paul Laband attempted to resurrect the idea, but failed due to the resistance of the other German princes.
- ISSN
-
2195-9617
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 74-99
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History, 24
- Thema
-
Geschichte
allgemeine Geschichte
Deutscher Bund
Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit
Konfliktregelung
Verfassungsrecht
Föderation
öffentliches Recht
19. Jahrhundert
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Zollmann, Jakob
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2016
- DOI
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:26 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Zollmann, Jakob
Entstanden
- 2016
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Re-rethinking the Amicable Settlement of Inter-State ECHR Disputes
Armenian-Turkish relations : from interstate dispute to neighborliness
The settlement of industrial disputes
International dispute settlement : room for innovations?
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
The juridization of interstate economic relations in East Asia : economic integration and dispute settlement in ASEAN, ACFTA, JSEPA, and CEPA compared
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Re-rethinking the Amicable Settlement of Inter-State ECHR Disputes
Armenian-Turkish relations : from interstate dispute to neighborliness
The settlement of industrial disputes
International dispute settlement : room for innovations?
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
The juridization of interstate economic relations in East Asia : economic integration and dispute settlement in ASEAN, ACFTA, JSEPA, and CEPA compared
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Does WTO Dispute Settlement Enforce or Inform?
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Austrägalgerichtsbarkeit: interstate dispute settlement in a confederate arrangement, 1815 to 1866
Re-rethinking the Amicable Settlement of Inter-State ECHR Disputes
Armenian-Turkish relations : from interstate dispute to neighborliness
The settlement of industrial disputes
International dispute settlement : room for innovations?
Demystifying Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
Should WTO dispute settlement be subsidized?
The juridization of interstate economic relations in East Asia : economic integration and dispute settlement in ASEAN, ACFTA, JSEPA, and CEPA compared
Closing Doors to Investor-State Dispute Settlement