Arbeitspapier

Collective choices under ambiguity

We investigate experimentally whether collective choice matters for individual attitudes to ambiguity. We consider a two-urn Ellsberg experiment: one urn offers a 45% chance of winning a fixed monetary prize, the other an ambiguous chance. Participants choose either individually or in groups of three. Group decision rules vary. In one treatment the collective choice is taken by majority; in another it is dictated by two group members; in the third it is dictated by a single group member. We observe high proportions of ambiguity averse choices in both individual and collective decision making. Although a majority of participants display consistent ambiguity attitudes across their decisions, collective choice tends to foster ambiguity aversion, especially if the decision rule assigns asymmetric responsibilities to group members. Previous participation in laboratory experiments may mitigate this.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Jena Economic Research Papers ; No. 2014-019

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Thema
ambiguity aversion
dictatorship
majority voting

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Levati, M. Vittoria
Napel, Stefan
Soraperra, Ivan
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
(wo)
Jena
(wann)
2014

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Levati, M. Vittoria
  • Napel, Stefan
  • Soraperra, Ivan
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2014

Ähnliche Objekte (12)