Better criteria for better evaluation? Reforming the international evaluation criteria
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Better criteria for better evaluation? Reforming the international evaluation criteria ; volume:2021 ; number:1
DEval policy brief ; 2021, Heft 1
- Classification
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Anthropologie
- Creator
-
Noltze, Martin
Harten, Sven
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021092810405847746113
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:31 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Noltze, Martin
- Harten, Sven
Other Objects (12)
Better Criteria for Better Evaluation? Reforming the International Evaluation Criteria
Information technology security evaluation criteria : (ITSEC) ; provisional harmonised criteria
Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Are countries reforming for the better?
Evaluation criteria for institutional credit projects
The Case for Reforming Euro Area Entry Criteria
Better off or more apart? Empirically testing welfare and inequality dominance criteria
Correction to: Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
Reforming legislatures : is one house better than two?
Reforming EU economic governance: is ‘more’ any better?
Evaluation criteria and evaluations for biometric authentication systems : international status
Better Criteria for Better Evaluation? Reforming the International Evaluation Criteria
Information technology security evaluation criteria : (ITSEC) ; provisional harmonised criteria
Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Are countries reforming for the better?
Evaluation criteria for institutional credit projects
The Case for Reforming Euro Area Entry Criteria
Better off or more apart? Empirically testing welfare and inequality dominance criteria
Correction to: Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
Reforming legislatures : is one house better than two?
Reforming EU economic governance: is ‘more’ any better?
Evaluation criteria and evaluations for biometric authentication systems : international status
Better Criteria for Better Evaluation? Reforming the International Evaluation Criteria
Information technology security evaluation criteria : (ITSEC) ; provisional harmonised criteria
Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Are countries reforming for the better?
Evaluation criteria for institutional credit projects
The Case for Reforming Euro Area Entry Criteria
Better off or more apart? Empirically testing welfare and inequality dominance criteria
Correction to: Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better
Reforming legislatures : is one house better than two?
Reforming EU economic governance: is ‘more’ any better?