Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
The impact of method bias on the cross-cultural comparability in face-to-face surveys among ethnic minorities
"This article investigates the impact of several sources of method bias on the cross-cultural comparison of attitudes towards gender roles and family ties among non-Western minority ethnic groups. In particular, it investigates how interviewer effects, the use of an interviewer with a shared ethnic background, interview language, interviewer gender, gender matching, the presence of others during the interview and differences in socio-demographic sample composition of non-Western minority ethnic groups affect the cross-cultural comparison of attitudes towards gender roles and family ties between these groups. The data used in this study come from a large scale face-to face survey conducted among the four largest non-Western minority ethnic groups in The Netherlands for which Statistics Netherlands drew a random sample of named individuals from each of the four largest non-Western minority populations living in The Netherlands. Furthermore, methods are introduced to estimate the potential impact of method bias on cross cultural comparisons. The results show that measurement of both gender roles and family ties constructs are full scalar invariant across the different ethnic groups, but that observed differences in attitudes between ethnic groups especially towards gender roles are influenced by method bias. This in turn leads to biased comparisons between ethnic groups because of differences in the size of the various sources of method bias, the differential impact of the same method bias between ethnic groups and the combination thereof." (author's abstract)
- ISSN
-
2190-4936
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 79-118
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 8(1)
- Thema
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
ethnische Gruppe
Minderheit
Befragung
Interview
Geschlechtsrolle
Familie
Niederlande
soziale Integration
kulturelle Integration
interkultureller Vergleich
Forschungsreaktivität
Antwortverhalten
Umfrageforschung
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Kappelhof, Joost W. S.
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2014
- DOI
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Kappelhof, Joost W. S.
Entstanden
- 2014
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction