Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2365-9440
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:4 ; month:9 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-23 ; date:12.2019
International journal of educational technology in higher education ; 16, Heft 1 (4.9.2019), 1-23, 12.2019
- Classification
-
Sprache, Linguistik
- Creator
-
Alhamami, Munassir
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s41239-019-0162-1
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2019122222402469336943
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:49 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Alhamami, Munassir
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Interviewer-related measurement error in face-to-face surveys
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)