Konferenzbeitrag
A case study of network neutrality in Korea
This study investigates the network neutrality issue in Korea by focusing on the debates among the stakeholders. It examines the dynamic discussions of the issues by identifying how diverse groups of stakeholders are affected by various actions taken by the emergence of network neutrality. It also presents a quantitative analysis that reveals the factors implicated in the net neutrality debate and statistically significant differences among individuals on opposite sides of the debate. A qualitative analysis reveals insights into the connection between specific factors and positions in the net neutrality debate. The findings show that the issue of net neutrality is not only complicated, but also as complex as the parties' diverse interests. The paper concludes that a careful combination of government intervention and market forces is an effective way to govern net neutrality.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: 23rd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Vienna, Austria, 1st-4th July, 2012
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Subject
-
Network neutrality
stakeholder analysis
web of stakeholders
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Shin, Dong-Hee
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
International Telecommunications Society (ITS)
- (where)
-
Calgary
- (when)
-
2012
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Konferenzbeitrag
Associated
- Shin, Dong-Hee
- International Telecommunications Society (ITS)
Time of origin
- 2012
Other Objects (12)
Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea
Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea
Network neutrality: Hong Kong's perspectives
Governing network neutrality: Public perception and policy capacity
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The value of network neutrality to European consumers
Alternatives to network neutrality: A South African perspective
Does net neutrality work? The Dutch case
A layered and nuanced assessment of network neutrality rationales
Escalating Instability of Network Neutrality Policy in the U.S.
Shedding light on net neutrality: The Brazilian case
Network neutrality and consumer discrimination: Comparing ISP's GTCs and DPI application
Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea
Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea
Network neutrality: Hong Kong's perspectives
Governing network neutrality: Public perception and policy capacity
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The value of network neutrality to European consumers
Alternatives to network neutrality: A South African perspective
Does net neutrality work? The Dutch case
A layered and nuanced assessment of network neutrality rationales
Escalating Instability of Network Neutrality Policy in the U.S.
Shedding light on net neutrality: The Brazilian case
Network neutrality and consumer discrimination: Comparing ISP's GTCs and DPI application
Application of Actor-Network Theory to Network Neutrality in Korea
Network neutrality: Insights gained by juxtaposing the US and Korea
Network neutrality: Hong Kong's perspectives
Governing network neutrality: Public perception and policy capacity
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The value of network neutrality to European consumers
Alternatives to network neutrality: A South African perspective
Does net neutrality work? The Dutch case
A layered and nuanced assessment of network neutrality rationales
Escalating Instability of Network Neutrality Policy in the U.S.
Shedding light on net neutrality: The Brazilian case