Randomised Evaluations of Accepted Choices in Treatment (REACT) trials: large-scale pragmatic trials within databases of routinely collected electronic healthcare records
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Randomised Evaluations of Accepted Choices in Treatment (REACT) trials: large-scale pragmatic trials within databases of routinely collected electronic healthcare records ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:12 ; year:2011 ; pages:1 ; date:12.2011
Trials ; 12, Heft 1 (13.12.2011), 1, 12.2011
- Creator
-
van Staa, Tjeerd-Pieter
- Contributor
-
Goldacre, Ben
Gulliford, Martin
Cassell, Jackie
Pirmohamed, Munir
Taweel, Adel
Delaney, Brendan
Smeeth, Liam
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A104
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016050223732
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:56 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- van Staa, Tjeerd-Pieter
- Goldacre, Ben
- Gulliford, Martin
- Cassell, Jackie
- Pirmohamed, Munir
- Taweel, Adel
- Delaney, Brendan
- Smeeth, Liam
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications
Accessing routinely collected health data to improve clinical trials: recent experience of access
Trials
Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials – review of successful data requests to UK registries
Nops trials
Noninferiority trials
Imaginary Trials
Economic evaluations performed alongside randomized implementation trials in clinical settings: a systematic review
Uptake of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
Enhancing open clinical trials through blinded evaluations: an exploration with diabetic foot infections
Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications
Accessing routinely collected health data to improve clinical trials: recent experience of access
Trials
Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials – review of successful data requests to UK registries
Nops trials
Noninferiority trials
Imaginary Trials
Economic evaluations performed alongside randomized implementation trials in clinical settings: a systematic review
Uptake of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
Enhancing open clinical trials through blinded evaluations: an exploration with diabetic foot infections
Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications
Accessing routinely collected health data to improve clinical trials: recent experience of access
Trials
Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials – review of successful data requests to UK registries
Nops trials
Noninferiority trials
Imaginary Trials
Economic evaluations performed alongside randomized implementation trials in clinical settings: a systematic review
Uptake of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in Australia: an observational study
Enhancing open clinical trials through blinded evaluations: an exploration with diabetic foot infections
Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations