Evaluation of an ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing: clinical performances and correlation with plaque reduction neutralization titer
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Evaluation of an ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing: clinical performances and correlation with plaque reduction neutralization titer ; volume:58 ; number:11 ; year:2020 ; pages:e247-e249 ; extent:03
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine ; 58, Heft 11 (2020), e247-e249 (gesamt 03)
- Urheber
- DOI
-
10.1515/cclm-2020-1096
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022061716560174913365
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:24 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Padoan, Andrea
- Bonfante, Francesco
- Sciacovelli, Laura
- Cosma, Chiara
- Basso, Daniela
- Plebani, Mario
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture
SARS-CoV-2 antibody performances: we need better criteria
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan