Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2058-8615
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews ; volume:4 ; number:1 ; day:19 ; month:12 ; year:2019 ; pages:1-11 ; date:12.2019
Research integrity and peer review ; 4, Heft 1 (19.12.2019), 1-11, 12.2019
- Creator
-
Steegmans, Pauline A. J.
Girolamo, Nicola Di
Meursinge Reynders, Reint A.
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s41073-019-0084-4
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020040520350562326456
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:58 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Steegmans, Pauline A. J.
- Girolamo, Nicola Di
- Meursinge Reynders, Reint A.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting quality of systematic reviews with moxibustion
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Reporting quality of scoping reviews in dental public health
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews
Glossary of orthodontic terms
Reporting quality of systematic reviews with moxibustion
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Reporting quality of scoping reviews in dental public health
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews
Glossary of orthodontic terms
Reporting quality of systematic reviews with moxibustion
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Reporting quality of scoping reviews in dental public health
Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA)
Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews