Arbeitspapier
oTree: The Equality Equivalence Test
Based on a small set of assumptions on preferences, Kerschbamer (2015) introduces a geometric delineation of distributional preferences and a parsimonious, non-parametric identification procedure - the Equality Equivalence Test (EET). The assumptions of the test result in a mutually exclusive taxonomy of social preference archetypes, nesting all empirically relevant types identified in the literature. This article presents a ready-to-use software module for use with oTree (Chen et al., 2016), which facilitates the implementation of the EET in the laboratory, the field, or online. The app can be straightforwardly configured and parametrized using a single file and can be seamlessly integrated into existing projects. Furthermore, the app features predefined evaluations of subjects' responses and provides a real-time report of the results in the experimenter's dashboard. By this means, the module offers a comprehensive, flexible, and time-saving tool for implementing and conducting the EET in a myriad of configurations determined by the user.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: Working Papers in Economics and Statistics ; No. 2020-14
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
Design of Experiments: General
Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making‡
- Thema
-
oTree
Equality Equivalence Test
Distributional Preferences
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Holzmeister, Felix
Kerschbamer, Rudolf
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
University of Innsbruck, Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics (eeecon)
- (wo)
-
Innsbruck
- (wann)
-
2020
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Holzmeister, Felix
- Kerschbamer, Rudolf
- University of Innsbruck, Research Platform Empirical and Experimental Economics (eeecon)
Entstanden
- 2020
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
An equality test across nonparametric regressions
Ricardian Equivalence and Non Equivalence: An Overview
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Do tax cuts increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Do tax cuts Increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Revenue Equivalence Revisited
Characterization of revenue equivalence
Equality of when?
Equity and equality
Risk Matters: Breaking Certainty Equivalence
An equality test across nonparametric regressions
Ricardian Equivalence and Non Equivalence: An Overview
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Do tax cuts increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Do tax cuts Increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Revenue Equivalence Revisited
Characterization of revenue equivalence
Equality of when?
Equity and equality
Risk Matters: Breaking Certainty Equivalence
An equality test across nonparametric regressions
Ricardian Equivalence and Non Equivalence: An Overview
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Permutation tests for equality of distributions of functional data
Do tax cuts increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Do tax cuts Increase consumption? An experimental test of Ricardian Equivalence
Revenue Equivalence Revisited
Characterization of revenue equivalence
Equality of when?
Equity and equality