A world map of evidence-based medicine : density equalizing mapping of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
In: PLoS one, volume 14, issue 12, e0226305 (2019), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226305
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Frankfurt am Main
- (wer)
-
Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
- (wann)
-
2019
- Urheber
-
Groneberg, Jan David Alexander
Rolle, Stefan
Bendels, Michael Hans Karl
Klingelhöfer, Doris
Schöffel, Norman
Bauer, Jan
Brüggmann, Dörthe
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-518787
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 14.08.2025, 10:49 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Groneberg, Jan David Alexander
- Rolle, Stefan
- Bendels, Michael Hans Karl
- Klingelhöfer, Doris
- Schöffel, Norman
- Bauer, Jan
- Brüggmann, Dörthe
- Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
Entstanden
- 2019
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis
Reporting quality of Cochrane systematic reviews with Chinese herbal medicines
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Reporting of methods to prepare, pilot and perform data extraction in systematic reviews: analysis of a sample of 152 Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis