Arbeitspapier

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Democratic Ideal

In traditional cost-benefit analyses of public projects, every citizen's willingness to pay for a project is given an equal weight. This is sometimes taken to imply that cost-benefit analysis is a democratic method for making public decisions, as opposed to, for example, political processes involving log-rolling and lobbying from interest groups. Politicians are frequently criticized for not putting enough emphasis on the cost-benefit analyses when making decisions. In this paper we discuss the extent to which using cost-benefit analysis to rank public projects is consistent with Dahl's (1989) criteria for democratic decision-making. We find several fundamental conflicts, both when cost-benefit analysis is used to provide final answers about projects' social desirability, and when used only as informational input to a political process. Our conclusions are illustrated using data from interviews with Norwegian politicians.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Discussion Papers ; No. 205

Classification
Wirtschaft
Relation of Economics to Social Values
Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
Analysis of Collective Decision-Making: General
Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
Subject
Democracy
cost-benefit analysis

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Nyborg, Karine
Spangen, Inger
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Statistics Norway, Research Department
(where)
Oslo
(when)
1997

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Nyborg, Karine
  • Spangen, Inger
  • Statistics Norway, Research Department

Time of origin

  • 1997

Other Objects (12)