CCS - Failing to Pass Decision Gates

Arbeitspapier

There is a planning gap for CCS projects in Europe. CCS demonstration plants are not implemented as expected. This fact is at odds with optimistic valuation reports that apply socio-economic valuation criteria for climate projects. However, CCS plants are in most cases to be implemented by private companies. Economic valuation of climate projects, seen from the perspective of the commercial companies, is the subject of this article. We examine key economic parameters of 27 oil and gas projects and compare it to a CCS project. We find that the CCS project ranks the lowest on all profitability metrics, and is unlikely to be implemented by a private company. Our findings may explain why it is hard for oil companies to justify climate projects in their portfolios.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 4944

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Business Economics ; Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation ; Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies; Capacity ; Valuation of Environmental Effects ; Energy: Government Policy
• Subject: climate projects ; decision analysis ; CO2

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Emhjellen, Magne ; Osmundsen, Petter
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
• (where): Munich
• (when): 2014

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102098
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET